大发体育

Position: Home > Information disclosure > Government News > Notice

Self-evaluation Report on Financial Project Expenditure Performance of Nanning City

Release time: 2017-01-05 14:44

Performance Evaluation Report on Financial Project Expenditure of the Judicial Bureau of Nanning

Project Name: Legal Publicity Fee

Project organizer: Nanning Justice Bureau

Evaluation agency: Nanning Justice Bureau

December 2016

I. Basic information of the project

(I) Project Overview

1. Project approval background

According to the spirit of the Nanning Municipal People ’s Government of the Communist Party of China ’s Communist Party of China ’s Seventh Five-Year Plan ( 2016-2020) on the Promotion of the Education and Promotion of the Rule of Law Among Citizens Standards, including publicity funds for the legal system in the fiscal budget at the same level, to achieve full allocation, dedicated funds.

2. Project implementation

The project uses a relatively fixed amount and model as a recurring item each year, covering the scope of the rule of law propaganda business of the various departments of the Judiciary, and the project implementation is good.

3. Funding sources and usage

The source of funding was the full financial allocation, and the legal system promotion costs of 1.4 million yuan were all used in the promotion of the rule of law.

(Two) project performance goals

Annual performance target: It is planned to arrange 1.4 million yuan as the expenditure for our unit to carry out the law popularization work, to ensure that the unit's law popularization work task is successfully completed.

Performance of performance evaluation

(I) Performance evaluation design process

The design of the project performance evaluation index was designed by the performance management department of our bureau, and according to the work characteristics of the Judiciary Bureau, it was consistent with the city's performance appraisal standard, and the project performance index was formulated.

(Two) performance evaluation framework

According to the requirements of the relevant documents of the financial department, perform performance evaluation around the main indicators and design key indicators.

1. Principles of performance evaluation

The performance evaluation combines the actual work situation of the Municipal Judicial Bureau, and uses the reasonable evaluation methods and comparison standards to objectively and fairly evaluate all aspects involved in the project in accordance with the set performance goals.

2. Evaluation index system

The indicators are mainly formulated according to the indicators set by the financial department, the performance evaluation management system and unit functions and responsibilities, development planning, annual work plans, and annual performance targets. The selection is scientific, flexible, operable, and close to reality. Divided into long-term, annual performance indicators.

3. Performance standards

Adhere to the objective and in line with the actual principles, set scores according to the project, and evaluate the score.

4. Evaluation method

The most direct comparison method is used to compare the performance scores of performance indicators and evaluate based on this.

(IV) Implementation process of performance evaluation

The Nanning Judicial Bureau has designated the Performance Office and the Planning and Finance Section as responsible. 项目绩效目标进行,一是前期准备,明确工作分工、了解基本情况、设计指标体系;二是收集信息,分别落实工作,请有关部门及时报送材料;三是对照检查核实,提出意见建议;四是数据分析、评价,相关部门交流意见,形成报告。 According to the project performance goals, one is to make preliminary preparations, clarify the division of work, understand the basic situation, and design an index system; the other is to collect information and implement the work separately, and invite relevant departments to submit materials in a timely manner; the third is to check and verify, and make suggestions; The fourth is data analysis and evaluation, and relevant departments exchange opinions and form reports.   

(V) Limitations of this performance evaluation

The evaluation was carried out by a special department designated by the unit, and the evaluation was not comprehensive.

Third, performance analysis and evaluation conclusions

(A) performance analysis

Investment

Project establishment specifications, established in accordance with prescribed procedures, meet relevant requirements; reasonable goals, in line with the functional tasks of the unit; project expected goals combined with actual and annual work requirements, clear indicators; budget funds in place to ensure project progress. Other aspects match the actual situation.

2. process

The business department carried out in accordance with the relevant management system and complied with relevant laws and regulations and business management regulations; complete project expenditure procedures, timely collection of relevant data and archiving; timely implementation of relevant work to ensure the smooth progress of the work.

The financial department has standardized management and a sound system. It supervises and regulates the use of funds without interception, embezzlement, or embezzlement.

3. Output

Project output is actually completed to achieve performance goals.

4. Effect

The characteristics of the project determine that this project has promoted the construction of the rule of law in Nanning and strengthened citizens' awareness of the rule of law.

5. Analysis of achievement of performance targets

On the whole, the project has completed well.

(II) Evaluation conclusions

This year's "legal propaganda fees", standardized work and fund management, completed in accordance with the plan, social benefits are better, and the service targets are generally satisfied.

Performance Evaluation Report on Financial Project Expenditure of the Judicial Bureau of Nanning

         Project Name: Working Expenses of the Medical Dispute Mediation Committee

Project organizer: Nanning Justice Bureau

Evaluation agency: Nanning Justice Bureau

December 2016

I. Basic information of the project

(I) Project Overview

1. Project approval background

In order to thoroughly implement the spirit of our city's "Opinions on Strengthening the People's Mediation in Medical Disputes" (Nanfuban [ 2013] No. 106), it is clear that the financial department will include the relevant funds for people's mediation in medical disputes into the fiscal year budget to ensure that the city's medical disputes People's mediation work is proceeding normally.

2. Project implementation

The fund of this project is listed as a recurring project each year with a relatively fixed amount and model, and it is based on documents to provide a strong legal and regulatory basis for the medical dispute mediation committee's work funding projects, so that the project can be followed by rules and laws The implementation of the project is good.

3. Funding sources and usage

医疗纠纷调解委员会工作经费 45万元全部用于医疗纠纷调解。 The source of funds was the full financial allocation, and the medical dispute mediation committee's work fund of 450,000 yuan was used for medical dispute mediation.

(Two) project performance goals

The amount of RMB 450,000 is used as the normal expenditure for the medical dispute mediation committee of our unit to ensure the smooth completion of the project task.

Performance of performance evaluation

(I) Performance evaluation design process

The design of the project performance evaluation index was designed by the performance management department of our bureau, and according to the work characteristics of the Judiciary Bureau, it was consistent with the city's performance appraisal standard, and the project performance index was formulated.

(Two) performance evaluation framework

According to the requirements of the relevant documents of the financial department, perform performance evaluation around the main indicators and design key indicators.

1. Principles of performance evaluation

The performance evaluation combines the actual work situation of our bureau, according to the set performance goals, using reasonable evaluation methods, comparison standards, and objectively and impartially evaluates all aspects involved in the project.

2. Evaluation index system

The indicators are mainly formulated according to the indicators set by the financial department, the performance evaluation management system and unit functions and responsibilities, development planning, annual work plans, and annual performance targets. The selection is scientific, flexible, operable, and close to reality. Divided into long-term, annual performance indicators.

3. Performance standards

Adhere to the objective and in line with the actual principles, set scores according to the project, and evaluate the score.

4. Evaluation method

The most direct comparison method is used to compare the performance scores of performance indicators and evaluate based on this.

(IV) Implementation process of performance evaluation

The Nanning Judicial Bureau has designated the Performance Office and the Planning and Finance Section as responsible. 项目绩效目标进行,一是前期准备,明确工作分工、了解基本情况、设计指标体系;二是收集信息,分别落实工作,请有关部门及时报送材料;三是对照检查核实,提出意见建议;四是数据分析、评价,相关部门交流意见。 According to the project performance goals, one is to make preliminary preparations, clarify the division of work, understand the basic situation, and design an index system; the other is to collect information and implement the work separately, and invite relevant departments to submit materials in a timely manner; the third is to check and verify, and make suggestions; The fourth is data analysis and evaluation, and relevant departments exchange opinions.   

(V) Limitations of this performance evaluation

The evaluation was carried out by a special department designated by the unit, and the evaluation was not comprehensive.

Third, performance analysis and evaluation conclusions

(A) performance analysis

Investment

Project establishment specifications, established in accordance with prescribed procedures, meet relevant requirements; reasonable goals, in line with the functional tasks of the unit; project expected goals combined with actual and annual work requirements, clear indicators; budget funds in place to ensure project progress. Other aspects match the actual situation.

2. process

The business department carried out the relevant management system, and complied with relevant laws and regulations and business management regulations; complete project expenditure procedures, timely collection of relevant information and archiving; timely implementation of relevant work to ensure the smooth progress of the work.

The financial department has standardized management and a sound system. It supervises and regulates the use of funds without interception, embezzlement, or embezzlement.

3. Output

Project output is actually completed to achieve performance goals.

4. Effect

The characteristics of the project determine that the project relies on the city's great mediation work system, establishes a convenient, fair, and efficient third-party mediation mechanism for medical disputes, and effectively plays an important role of people's mediation work in resolving medical disputes.

5. Analysis of achievement of performance targets

  The completion of the project is good.

(II) Evaluation conclusions

医疗纠纷调解委员会工作经费 ”,工作与经费管理规范,按计划完成,社会效益较好,服务对象总体较满意。 This year's " Medical Dispute Mediation Committee Work Funding ", the work and funding management are standardized, completed in accordance with the plan, social benefits are better, and the service target is generally satisfied.

Organizer: Nanning Justice Bureau

Postcode: 530028 E-mail: sifainfo@paketwisatadijogja.com Phone: 0771-3860032

Gui ICP No. 17001629 Website ID: 4501000025 International Networking Record No .: 45010302000015

GuiGong Network Security No. 45010302000355

两元彩票网-大发体育 重庆彩票-大发体育 500彩票-大发体育 网易彩票-大发体育 江西快三-大发体育 爱彩票网-大发体育 重庆彩票-大发体育 网易彩票 网络彩票-大发体育 内蒙古快三-大发体育 500彩票-大发体育 ds真人娱乐 澳客网彩票-大发体育 ag真人注册 彩天堂 福利网 江苏福彩网 网站地图